个人资料
正文

James Galbraith 美国经济滋生不平等和不安全 如何解决

(2024-08-04 11:10:14) 下一个

James Galbraith 美国经济滋生不平等和不安全 如何解决

破碎的美国经济滋生了不平等和不安全感。以下是如何解决这个问题

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/oct/07/us-economy-growth-inequality-james-k-galbraith

詹姆斯·K·加尔布雷斯

一边是财富和权力的海洋。另一边是动荡和无能为力。但我们有改革的工具
2022 年 10 月 7 日 13.47 BST
利率上升、股市下跌、汽油价格波动、美元走高和世界金融混乱——我们再次看到,试图通过中央银行来管理世界最大经济体的愚蠢行为。是时候重新思考基本问题了:美国发生了什么?应该怎么做?

亚当·斯密写道:“正如霍布斯先生所说,财富就是权力。”如今,在美国,一边是财富和权力的孤岛,另一边是动荡和无能为力的海洋,还有贫穷。这是 50 多年来结构性发展的结果,是政治和政策的影响,也是工业变革、全球化和新技术的影响,具有强烈的区域、社会、人口和政治影响。

美国抵押贷款利率攀升至 6.7%,为 15 年来的最高水平

从 20 世纪 30 年代到 70 年代,美国拥有以腹地为中心的中产阶级经济,为世界提供机械和商品,同时将劳动力从贫困的南部吸引到繁荣的中西部——强大的工会和世界主导企业的经济体。这已成为一个由全球化金融、保险和高端服务主导的两岸经济,而另一岸则由信息技术、航空航天和娱乐主导。

金融和技术并不能创造很多就业机会,而这些行业的商业行为是贪婪和掠夺性的,常常演变成欺诈。几年前,我们计算了 1990 年代繁荣时期各县之间的收入不平等加剧情况,发现其中一半的增长仅归因于五个县的收入增长:曼哈顿、硅谷、西雅图。此后,还有其他一些县的收入大幅增长,但事实依然存在:美国最大的收入和财富增长高度集中在少数非常特定的地方、行业和人群中。

然而,过去 30 年创造的几乎所有新工作岗位都来自服务业,而且大多数来自“停滞的服务业”——餐馆、零售店、医院和诊所、办公室和娱乐场所的大量涌现,这些行业的推动力是家庭收入(和借款)超过物质商品需求。这些工作的薪水一般,就业也不稳定。家庭通过拥有两个或两个以上挣钱的人来弥补,每个人有时都从事两份或两份以上工作,而 50 年前,常态是一个挣钱的人有一份稳定的工作,能支付生活工资。然后,新冠疫情重创了该行业。

不管好坏,我们都无法回头:全球化和数字革命是生活中不可逆转的事实。2021 年 6 月白宫对供应链的评估以半导体、稀土、电池和药品为例,明确说明了这一点。我们的先进行业需要世界市场(包括中国市场),就像它们需要获得世界资源一样。美国消费者受益于进口商品和信息时代的效率。

问题是:我们现在该怎么做?我们可以调整,建立一个公平、安全的中产阶级社会,摆脱贫困和寡头政治,使用我们广泛熟悉的工具。这些工具包括:

扩大社会保险
社会保障、医疗保险、医疗补助、失业保险和 Snap 已经大大减少了美国的贫困、不安全和饥饿。它们可以扩大和加强。如果我们不能实现全民医保,那么就把参保年龄降低到 55 岁——这将覆盖大部分最脆弱的人口,并一下子减轻雇主的私人医疗保险负担。

提高最低工资
每小时 15 美元的联邦最低工资将为至少 20% 的美国劳动者提供加薪。这将一下子解决所谓的“劳动力短缺”问题——而不会损害任何雇主的利益。它也不会鼓励移民,因为美国工人会主动接受薪水不错的工作。

实施就业保障
联邦就业保障是一项精心准备的提案,它将消除非自愿失业,设定基本工资标准,并为有意愿的工人提供有用项目的持续就业,为私人雇主提供劳动力资源,他们可以从中轻松招募所需的工人。

稳定能源价格和供应
田纳西河流域管理局和其他机构根据长期合同提供稳定的电力。为什么石油和天然气应该由私募股权在繁荣与萧条的基础上经营?稳定能源价格和供应——通过监管、配额、价格控制(如德国目前的做法)、长期合同和公用事业——许多其他问题将变得更容易解决。

建设公共服务、基础设施,应对气候问题

改变
同时削减军事承诺和开支。基础设施的主要作用是改善生活质量,提供清洁的水和空气、良好的交通和通讯,并紧急改变资源结构,尽可能缓解全球变暖。我们不能满足这些需求,同时又把我们的才能和资源投入到战争中——阿富汗和伊拉克战争之后,这种限制已经很明显了。是时候结束美国能够或应该统治世界的幻想了。

将税收转向土地租金
古典经济学的一个重要原则是,税收应该鼓励劳动和企业,同时阻止公共和私人领域的浪费。在 20 世纪 80 年代,税收从个人和企业收入和资本收益转移到工资和销售额——不出所料,结果是超级富豪寡头的崛起。现在的补救措施是对这些积累和相关租金(土地价值、矿产权、技术“准租金”)征税,以便让新富豪回归现实。更严格的遗产税和赠与税可以刺激巨额财富向基金会和非营利组织(如医院、大学和教堂)转移,同时防止金融和政治王朝的出现。

趁为时未晚,改革银行业
《格拉斯-斯蒂格尔法案》保护了中产阶级(商业银行的普通存款人)免受精英投机冲动的影响。今天,尽管发生了严重的金融危机,但大资金又重新掌权了——美国公众和全世界的大部分人都对此感到厌倦。也许最艰难、最必要的改革是减少债务(包括学生债务)、缩小银行规模、恢复有效监管、起诉欺诈行为,以及规范金融以服务于公众利益。这将使银行家失去魅力,也使管理美联储失去令人陶醉的权力。

该计划现实吗?也许不现实。但请考虑一下我们所走的道路。我提出的是另一种选择——远离干草叉、无政府状态和内战。

詹姆斯·K·加尔布雷斯 (James K Galbraith) 是德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校林登·B·约翰逊公共事务学院政府/商业关系专业的 Lloyd M Bentsen Jr 教授。20 世纪 70 年代,他起草了《汉弗莱-霍金斯充分就业和平衡增长法案》原版的货币政策监督条款

这就是我们面临的
来自富人和权贵的律师团队试图阻止我们发表他们不想让你看到的故事。

资金不透明的游说团体决心破坏有关气候紧急情况和其他既定科学的事实。

不顾新闻自由的专制国家。

坏人在网上传播虚假信息以破坏民主。

***

但我们拥有强大的力量。

我们拥有你。

《卫报》由像你一样的加拿大读者资助,唯一能决定我们发表什么内容的人是我们的编辑。

如果你想加入我们的使命,向世界分享独立的全球新闻,我们很乐意与你站在一起。

The broken US economy breeds inequality and insecurity. Here’s how to fix it

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/oct/07/us-economy-growth-inequality-james-k-galbraith

On one side, oceans of wealth and power. On the other, precarity and powerlessness. But we have the tools for reform
 7 Oct 2022 13.47 BST

Rising interest rates, a falling stock market, a seesaw in the price of gas, a high dollar and chaos in world finance – we see in all this, once again, the folly of trying to run the world’s largest economy through a central bank. It’s time to rethink the basics: what has happened in America? And what should be done?

Adam Smith wrote: “Wealth, as Mr Hobbes says, is power.” Today in the United States we find islands of wealth and power on one side and an ocean of precarity and powerlessness, alongside poverty, on the other. This is a structural development over 50 years, the effect of politics and policies, but also of industrial change, globalization and new technologies, with intense regional, social, demographic and political implications.

US mortgage rates climb to 6.7%, highest for 15 years

From the 1930s to the 1970s America had a middle-class economy centered in the heartland, feeding and supplying the world with machinery and goods while drawing labor from the impoverished south to the thriving midwest – an economy of powerful trade unions and world-dominant corporations. This has become a bicoastal economy dominated by globalized finance, insurance and high-end services on one coast, and by information technology, aerospace and entertainment on the other.

Finance and technology do not create many jobs, and the conduct of business in those sectors is rapacious and predatory, shading often into fraud. Some years ago we calculated the rise of income inequality measured between counties during the 1990s boom years, and found that half the increase was due to income gains in just five counties: Manhattan, Silicon Valley, Seattle. There have been other big gainers since, but the fact remains: the largest income and wealth gains in America have become highly concentrated in a few very specific places, sectors – and people.

Yet practically all new jobs created in the past 30 years have been in services, and most of those in “stagnant services” – the profusion of restaurants, retail shops, hospitals and clinics, offices and entertainment venues, fueled by household incomes (and borrowings) exceeding requirements for material goods. Pay in these jobs is mediocre and employment is unstable. Families compensated by having two or more earners, each sometimes holding two or more jobs, where 50 years ago the norm was one earner with a steady job paying a living wage. Then Covid blasted the sector.

For better or worse, we can’t go back: globalization and the digital revolution are irreversible facts of life. The June 2021 White House Review on the supply chain made this very clear, using semiconductors, rare earths, batteries and pharmaceuticals as examples. Our advanced sectors need world markets – including the Chinese market – as much as they need access to the world’s resources. US consumers benefit from imported goods and from the efficiencies of the information age.

The question is: what do we do now? We can adjust, and build a fair and secure middle-class society, free of poverty and of oligarchy alike, with tools that are broadly familiar. These tools include:

Expand social insurance

Social security, Medicare, Medicaid, unemployment insurance and Snap already greatly reduce poverty, insecurity and hunger in America. They can be broadened and strengthened. If we can’t get Medicare for All, then drop the age of eligibility to 55 – that would cover a large part of the most vulnerable population and reduce in a stroke the burden of private health insurance on employers.

Raise the minimum wage

A federal minimum wage at $15 per hour would provide a raise to at least 20% of all working Americans. It would solve in a stroke the supposed problem of “labor shortage” – without hurting any employer relative to any other. Nor would it encourage immigration, since US workers would step up to take decently paid jobs.

Implement a job guarantee

A federal job guarantee is well-prepared proposal that would eliminate involuntary unemployment, set a basic wage standard, and provide willing workers with continuous employment on useful projects, giving private employers a labor pool from which they can easily recruit the workers that they need.

Stabilize energy prices and supplies

The TVA and other agencies provide stable power under long-term contracts. Why should oil and gas be run by private equity on a boom-and-bust basis? Stabilize energy prices and supplies – with regulation, quotas, price controls (as in Germany right now), long-term contracts and public utilities – and many other problems would become much easier to solve.

Build public services, infrastructure, and fight climate change

And do this while cutting military commitments and spending. The main job of infrastructure is to improve the quality of life, with clean water and air, good transport and communications, and – urgently – to change the resource mix so as to mitigate, so far as possible, global warming. We cannot meet these needs and at the same time devote our talents and resources to wars – the limits to that are clear after Afghanistan and Iraq. It is past time to end the illusion that the United States can or should run the world.

Shift taxation toward land rent

A great principle of classical economics was that taxes should encourage labor and enterprise while discouraging waste in both the public and private spheres. In the 1980s, taxes were shifted away from personal and corporate incomes and capital gains and toward payrolls and sales – and the unsurprising result was the rise of an oligarchy of hyper-wealthy persons. The remedy now is to tax these accumulations and the associated rents – land values, mineral rights, technology “quasi-rents” – so as to bring the new plutocrats back to earth. A stronger estate-and-gift tax can spur the transfer of great fortunes to foundations and non-profits, such as hospitals, universities and churches, while working to prevent the emergence of dynasties, financial and political.

Reform banking before it’s too late

The Glass-Steagall Act protected the middle class – the ordinary depositor at a commercial bank – from the speculative whims of the elites. Today big money is back in charge, despite the great financial crisis – and much of the American public as well as the larger world is sick of it. Perhaps the toughest, most necessary reform is to reduce debts including student debts, to shrink the banks, to restore effective regulation, to prosecute frauds, and to discipline finance to serve the public good. This will take the glamour out of being a banker – and the intoxicating power out of running the Federal Reserve.

Is this program realistic? Perhaps not. But consider the path we’re on. What I propose is an alternative – to pitchforks, anarchy and civil war.

  • James K Galbraith holds the Lloyd M Bentsen Jr chair in government/business relations at the Lyndon B Johnson School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin. In the 1970s, he drafted the monetary policy oversight provisions of the original version of the Humphrey-Hawkins Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act

This is what we're up against

Teams of lawyers from the rich and powerful trying to stop us publishing stories they don’t want you to see. 

Lobby groups with opaque funding who are determined to undermine facts about the climate emergency and other established science. 

Authoritarian states with no regard for the freedom of the press.

Bad actors spreading disinformation online to undermine democracy. 

***

But we have something powerful on our side. 

We’ve got you. 

The Guardian is funded by readers like you in Canada and the only person who decides what we publish is our editor.

If you want to join us in our mission to share independent, global journalism to the world, we’d love to have you on side.

[ 打印 ]
阅读 ()评论 (0)
评论
目前还没有任何评论
登录后才可评论.