Marianne Williamson on Saturday announced her 2024 campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination. On Sunday, ABC's "This Week" aired her interview with ABC Chief Washington Correspondent Jonathan Karl. Below is their complete conversation. For previous show transcripts, visit the "This Week" transcript archive.

JONATHAN KARL, CHIEF WASHINGTON CORRESPONDENT: Thank you for taking the time to talk to us.

MARIANNE WILLIAMSON, PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Oh, thank you for having me.

KARL: Why do you want to be president?

WILLIAMSON: I want to be president because this country needs to make an economic U-turn. Over the last 48 years, according to the Rand Corporation, $50 trillion has been transferred from the bottom 90% of Americans to the top 1%. And the system that effectuates and perpetuates that kind of income and opportunity inequality is not changing itself.

It tweaks itself every once in a while. There are some incremental change. But the devastation, the ubiquitous economic despair and human devastation that is produced by this sociopathic economic system is not changing. And it's not going to change if we continue to elect the same-old same-old.

KARL: So you -- so you said Washington is filled with good political car mechanics.

WILLIAMSON: Yes.

KARL: The problem is that we are on the wrong road.

WILLIAMSON: Mm-hmm.

KARL: So what's the plan? I mean, I understand your diagnosis of the problem. What's the plan for changing that?

WILLIAMSON: Well, it will help, first of all, with the whole system's breakdown. No one person is going to make all the difference. No one elected official is going to make all the difference. It's the people of the United States who have to rise up. But a president who lays down the truth and tells it like it is would help.

A -- a president who actually gets in there and actually makes appointments and takes actions that obstructs the overreach of unfettered, unregulated capitalism, that would help a lot.

KARL: You -- you have been called, I think it was the Associated Press said you are the longest of long shots. And, you know, look, you've never held elected office before.

WILLIAMSON: Mm-hmm.

KARL: You -- you've run before. You've lost.

WILLIAMSON: Mm-hmm.

KARL: What -- why do you think you can do this?

WILLIAMSON: I would bet that the Associated Press also said that Hillary Clinton was a shoo-in. I'm sure that they would --

KARL: I don't know if --

WILLIAMSON: -- have said --

KARL: -- they would've used that language, actually.

WILLIAMSON: Maybe not. But that --

(CROSSTALK)

WILLIAMSON: -- system, you know exactly what I'm saying.

So the system that is now saying that I'm unserious, I'm not credible, or I'm a long shot is the very system that protects and maintains this idea that only those whose careers have been entrenched within the system that drove us into a ditch should possibly be considered qualified to lead us out of that ditch.

My qualification is not that I know how to perpetuate that system. My qualification is that I know how to disrupt it. And that is what we need --

(CROSSTALK)

KARL: Disrupt it how?

WILLIAMSON: Oh, well, the first thing you can do is you can cancel all college loan debt. You can make sure --

KARL: Now Biden just tried that and then the courts --

WILLIAMSON: He tried.

KARL: -- stopped him.

WILLIAMSON: He -- he tried, yes. And some people think if he had just canceled the entire thing that -- and he had done it immediately, that would not have given his opponents the opportunity to wage the kind of battle against that that it has.

But it is so much more than that.

KARL: I mean, you still have the courts, you know?

WILLIAMSON: It is so much more than that. Let's stop pretending that there has been such a gargantuan effort that has been made. We were promised that the -- that the -- that the minimum wage would be raised for everyone, and then when the parliamentarian said no, we hide behind the skirts of the parliamentarian?

KARL: But there are rules of how you -- how you could accomplish things. And you do have to work through Congress. I mean, we don't have a dictator in this country.

WILLIAMSON: There are many things that the president can do without working through Congress. There are many things. The president declassify marijuana right now. The president could cancel college loan debt. The president could cancel all contracts --

KARL: Again, he tried to do that. He tried to do that.

WILLIAMSON: He tried to do that in which way are we saying?

KARL: Cancel -- cancel college loan debt.

WILLIAMSON: Well, he tried with the part that he has. And that is part of a larger picture. He also could demand that there be an audit of every single cent that is being spent by the Pentagon. We could also cancel all of the contracts with union-busting companies. We could also influence Congress and -- and support Congress in calling by subpoena every CEO of every -- every industry, whether it's airlines or big pharma or big food or anyone else that has been price-gouging the people of the United States.

There are many things that the president could do. This president -- and this -- I don't see myself as running against Joe Biden. I see this campaign as challenging a system. But this administration has given more oil (ph) --

KARL: But you do have to beat Biden to -- I mean --

WILLIAMSON: Well, yes, I do.

KARL: -- if you're going do this, you have to --

WILLIAMSON: Yes, I do. And I plan on pointing out, not with any kind of negativity on a personal level, I have -- I have no interest in taking potshots on any person, let alone to this president, he's a nice man. And he has given more oil-drilling permits to fossil fuel extraction companies than Trump did. He has talked about what a -- what a existential crisis it is, the climate change, on the -- at the same time, the Inflation Reduction Act gives 5%, the money that we give to the military only 5%.

This is how I see President Biden. He is helping people -- I think he has a good heart. He is helping people survive an unjust system. We need to do more than that. We need to end an unjust system. It's like when Eleanor Roosevelt said to Franklin Roosevelt, we need more than the amelioration of stress. We need genuine economic reform.

That would be universal health care. That would be tuition-free college and tech schools. That would be free child care. That would be --

KARL: I mean -- I mean, Biden has had initiatives on each of those. But you have to -- I mean, to make changes like that, you do have to get Congress to -- to pass laws.

WILLIAMSON: Not all of them. No, that's not true.

In this June 5, 2021, file photo, Project Angel Food Founder Marianne Williamson is seen at the AIDS Monument Groundbreaking in West Hollywood, Calif.

KARL: I mean, universal health care, you're going to do that by executive order?

WILLIAMSON: Well, I will say this, what Libby, Montana, got -- where Libby, Montana, got that they got Medicare-for-All because of their emergency? So should Jackson, Mississippi. So should East Palestine. But it is more than that. This president has never used the bully pulpit to call for universal health care. This president has never --

(CROSSTALK)

KARL: I mean, he has been talking about health care for decades, to be fair. I mean, and -- and --

WILLIAMSON: That's right. But --

KARL: -- he was a big part of passing Obamacare and -- and --

WILLIAMSON: The -- the president has tried to improve Obamacare. Even with improved Obamacare, which I think he has accomplished to some extent, that is not universal health care. We have one in four Americans living with medical debt. We have 18 million Americans who cannot afford the prescription drugs that their doctors give them. We have 80 -- 68,000 Americans who die every year from lack of health care.

This kind of thing does not exist in other advanced democracies. Every other advanced democracy has universal health care. This is a moderate position in those countries. And it should be considered a moderate position here.

We're in a position, particularly as Democrats, when someone even makes the slightest effort, we go, “oh, that's so good”. And if they can't make it happen, “oh, poor baby”. You think the Republicans would treat their president that way if they failed to give them the blessings of democracy as they define them?

KARL: Well -- well, let me ask you this, because you endorsed Bernie Sanders when you got out of the race.

WILLIAMSON: I sure did.

KARL: You -- you called Elizabeth Warren -- I think you said she was a legend. I mean, you --

WILLIAMSON: She is. She -- I love those people.

KARL: Both of them have said that Biden deserves re-election.

WILLIAMSON: Well, that's their opinion. And this is the thing --

KARL: Are they wrong? So they're wrong?

WILLIAMSON: No, it's not about -- no. No, no, no. This is a democracy. This is not about what I think is wrong. Obviously I believe the American people should be offered an agenda for genuine, fundamental economic reform. And it should be the voters who decide. It should not be the DNC that decides. It should be the voters who decide. That is what a democracy is.

We -- this is not 100 years ago when a bunch of men smoking cigars get to sit around a table and decide the nominee.

KARL: Do you expect the DNC to have debates?

WILLIAMSON: Pardon?

KARL: Do -- do you expect to -- do you expect that Biden will debate you?

WILLIAMSON: He certainly should debate me. It's called democracy. And I'm running as well.

KARL: And -- and what about this notion of taking New Hampshire out of its -- out of its position as first? You're going to New Hampshire.

WILLIAMSON: I can tell you that New Hampshirites are not happy about that. The fact that the --

KARL: So will you be competing in the New Hampshire Primary?

WILLIAMSON: Absolutely --

KARL: Even though the DNC has said --

WILLIAMSON: -- I will. This is a democracy. This is the thing.

KARL: Yes.

WILLIAMSON: The DNC should not be rigging this system. They don't even pretend anymore. They're not even covert about their -- their swaying the -- the primary season. They're very overt about it. They're going to get --

(CROSSTALK)

KARL: So that's what's going on, is they're rigging the system for Biden.

WILLIAMSON: They even admit that, Jonathan.

KARL: OK.

WILLIAMSON: They admit that. They know that the president did not do well in New Hampshire. They know that New Hampshirites are very open to independent and more progressive voices.

KARL: Mm-hmm.

WILLIAMSON: And they know that they -- he did very well in South Carolina. They're not even -- you know this, I know this, they know this. And they're not even pretending otherwise.

KARL: Do you think Biden is too old to run for re-election?

WILLIAMSON: No. I -- I'm -- I'm not going there. I don't think ageism has any place in our -- in -- in our thinking. But I do think that the American people obviously know what the statistics are. They -- they know that --

KARL: What statistics?

WILLIAMSON: Well, the -- just the statistics as we get older. And -- and -- and the importance of who the vice president is, et cetera.

But once again, it should be the people who decide whether or not they feel any factor, the president's agenda or the president's personhood, would make them either vote for him or not vote for him.

KARL: So what is -- I mean, you're basically saying -- I know you're not going to make this personal, but you're basically saying that Biden doesn't deserve a second term.

WILLIAMSON: I wouldn't -- the word “deserve” is not what comes up for me. Those are your words. I'm saying that the president --

KARL: OK. But you're saying that he should -- he -- he should not be president again.

WILLIAMSON: Well, I'll tell you this. I do not believe that that is the winning ticket for 2024.

KARL: Will you endorse him if he wins the nomination?

WILLIAMSON: I will certainly endorse the candidate who I feel can beat the Republicans, absolutely.

KARL: So but -- but if he's the Democratic nominee, will you endorse him?

WILLIAMSON: I -- I will -- I will do whatever I feel I can do as an American to make sure that the neo-fascist threat that is represented by some aspects of the Republican Party does not win in 2024.

KARL: But you wouldn't run as a third party candidate if you lost --

(CROSSTALK)

WILLIAMSON: I'm not saying that I would run as a third party candidate. And I certainly wouldn't --

KARL: Are you saying you wouldn't, though?

WILLIAMSON: I'm saying that I will do what I can, as an American, a patriotic American to make sure that the overriding issue is addressed. And that's that the Neo-fascist threat of authoritarianism that is far too present in the current establishment of the Republican Party does not win the White House in 2024.

KARL: Is America better off? The old question is America better off. Were you better off now than you were four years ago? How would you Is America better off because Biden was elected president.

WILLIAMSON: 20% of Americans are doing very well in this economy. But that 20% are living on an enchanted island that is surrounded by a vast sea of economic despair and anxiety. That’s why--

KARL: So is the answer no, you don't think America is better off because Biden --

WILLIAMSON: America is over 360 million people. What I'm saying is the 20% of Americans are probably better off–

KARL: What about the other 80%?

WILLIAMSON: The other 80% are drowning, the other 80% are filled with people 1/3 of America's workforce that lives on less than $15 an hour, the other 80% of Americans, 64% of Americans, who are living paycheck to paycheck that people who are working full time at less than minimum wage, can't even afford a place to live. We're talking about 85 million Americans who are underinsured and underinsured. No for them, the economy is not going well. And they know that.

KARL: Let me ask you a bigger picture–

WILLIAMSON: So If I may say so,

KARL: Yes.

WILLIAMSON: If I may, for the Democrats to run in 2024 on the idea that the economy is doing well. That right there shows the unbelievable disconnect between DC think tanks and the visceral experience of the majority of Americans.

KARL: Do you think Trump could beat Biden?

WILLIAMSON: I would do everything I could to make sure that didn't happen. But it's not you know. This predictive thing is so silly. Nobody thought that Trump could beat Hillary, you know, this is not a football game. This is the state of our democracy, our environment and our economy that we're talking about. It's not a football game.

KARL: But let me ask you about your candidacy. You said last cycle that the media got you wrong by portraying you as anti-science, anti-vax, a crystal lady.

WILLIAMSON: Yeah.

KARL: So, how should Democrats view your candidacy?

WILLIAMSON: Well, I am an American, but I am Excuse me? Well, I am a Democrat, but I am an FDR Democrat. I think that I returned to the principles of FDR, a significantly unabashed advocacy for the working people of the United States is the great unfinished business of the Democratic Party. There are a lot of corporatist elite, establishment Democrats who look at progressives, such as myself and say, we're trying to hijack the party, they hijacked the party. I'm old enough to remember a time when the Democratic Party more than not, did make an unequivocal stance, we're now at a point where we have a Democratic president siding with the railroad, as opposed to with the workers on that railroad who only want sick pay. No, the Democratic Party needs to be a conduit for the healing of this country. But first, the Democratic Party needs to look in the mirror and heal itself.

KARL: You've talked a lot about cutting defense spending, how much? How much would you cut --

WILLIAMSON: You know, I'd like to see 30%. But that's not going to happen. So, you know, I understand that. I think what we need to have as a serious conversation about the fact that it was $858 billion, that it is today, so much more than any other nation, there are people within the military themselves. Who would say that this is more than we need for actual --

KARL: Where would you cut

WILLIAMSON: -- actual security.

KARL: -- for security?

WILLIAMSON: I don't know specifically where I would cut it from. But I'll tell you this much, when -- when you're looking at what should the United States be concerned about in terms of dangers coming down the road? I think climate change in many people's minds is a bigger danger. And I'm not under estimating or minimizing some of the international dangers that exist. But I think that if we're really talking about keeping this country secure, this has more to do with money for defense contractors for Northrop Grumman for Boeing for Raytheon, then it has to do with the genuine security concerns of the American people. And the difference between now and even four years ago, is how many people now see that.

KARL: You've supported much of what the administration has done–

WILLIAMSON: Pardon?

KARL:You've supported much of what President Biden has done in Ukraine. But I want to ask you something you said right after the invasion, you said Putin is a madman, but his madness has been matched by a madness of our own. Do you really --

WILLIAMSON: But not in this situation.

KARL: But do you believe?

WILLIAMSON: What do you think Iraq was? I think the imperialism of Iraq the imperialism of the last 20 years, not --

KARL: Do you think that's the same as Putin invading Ukraine?

WILLIAMSON: There, there-- listen, we're talking about a bad guy versus a really, really, really bad guy. Let's be very clear here. The United States needs to look in the mirror. Vietnam should-- War should not have occurred. The Iraq war should not have occurred. The last 20 years in in Afghanistan were a moral and military failure, millions of people Around the world and thousands of Americans died --

KARL: But this is entirely different than a war of conquest, isn't it? I mean, Putin invaded another country --

WILLIAMSON: And I'm -- oh, and I -- excuse me, I support the President's basic policy here. If we were to if we were to withdraw military support from Ukraine right now, there would be no Ukraine. That is not acceptable to me.

KARL: So, you support, you support the funding of the Ukrainian military, the sending of weapons over there --

WILLIAMSON: Right now -- well, I feel --

KARL: -- setting up tanks.

WILLIAMSON: I feel the President is being careful he is being considered. He has said no jets for now. So, right now, I basically I while I do not support all of the rhetoric of the president regarding -- regarding this war, for the most part, for the most part, I support that policy.

KARL: I'm gonna ask you something else that you said, though, in the earlier stages of this war, you said “there is certainly enough blame to go around, and that includes the United States. For years, we've been encouraging Ukrainian behavior that posed a threat to Russia's sphere of influence. Any American can appreciate that if Canada or Mexico aligned itself with the Russian military interests, we would cry foul to say the least”.

WILLIAMSON: I do not think the United States should be proud of some of the ways we dealt with NATO. I think it is a general consensus even in this town that the missiles in Poland, the HHS missiles were not a good idea. But please don't get me wrong. And don't let your viewers get me wrong. I am not equating America's behavior in this situation with Vladimir Putin. Nothing that the United States has done justifies the this is a brutal dictator, dictator, and nothing that the United States has done, justifies what he is doing.

If we're going to be anti-imperialist about America, we have to be anti-imperialist about Russia. What the United States needs to stand for in every situation is negotiation and diplomacy. The only question right now even Milley said the RAND Corporation said, General Milley and the RAND Corporation have both said, this is going to end with negotiation, this is going to be negotiated into a conflict. The only question now is, at what point is that possible in a way that supports Ukraine the most? And I think that’s what we’re trying to do--

KARL: Yeah at what point can you get Putin to negotiate?

WILLIAMSON: That's well, not -- not -- not right now, because he feels he's winning the war. And that is why I support our policies at this time.

KARL: Do you think America is the greatest nation on Earth?

WILLIAMSON: I think that the -- no, I don't think that God -- I think God created all people equal. So, that kind of talk is seventh grade, and sophomoric and does not serve us. I think that there are exceptional principles, the exceptional principles at the core of our Declaration of Independence, that all men are created equal is -- is exceptional, that God gave all men inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, that's exceptional, that governments are instituted to secure those rights. And it's the right of the people to alter it if the if it is not doing so that is exceptional. However, the fact that your principles are exceptional, doesn't mean you're actualizing those principles some generations have in really brilliant ways and some haven't, and we are right now experiencing the same struggle, as other generations have between those who seek to expand the democratic -- democratic franchise and those who seek to narrow it.

KARL: Let me ask you about China, because President Biden suggested is the biggest long term threat facing the United States. How, as President, would you handle China if they invaded if China invaded Taiwan?

WILLIAMSON: First of all, I don't like the saber rattling that's even involved in that question. China's economy is not doing well. We must keep our competition with China off the battlefield. China knows that we and other Western and Western allies could cause a lot of problems for them economically, if they were to do that, just as we know that they could mess with us. We must be very careful, we must be very firm, we must not let them bully us or our allies. But we -- as much as we must make a stand for such things as human rights. At this point, we must be committed that this not spill over into a military confrontation.

KARL: But should we be committed to defending Taiwan?

WILLIAMSON: There are ways to defend Taiwan other than military. And I don't think I don't think that Taiwan appreciates that Americans are having this conversation the way they are. They have played this very carefully. They keep their heads down. They don't even go there--

KARL: They invited Nancy Pelosi to come--

WILLIAMSON: Did they invite her? There are many there were many Taiwanese who were not happy that she was coming there at all.

ABC News’ Jon Karl interviews Marianne Williamson on “This Week.”

KARL: OK, last question. You in a in a blog post talking about possibly running for President recently you said “Change is inevitable in this country. We are either going to have a peaceful revolution or a violent one". What do you mean by that?

WILLIAMSON: Excuse me, did you not cover January 6th?

KARL: Yes, oh I did.

WILLIAMSON: What is happening in this country is that people who -- who are experienced vast amounts of economic fear anxiety, when you have this much economic anxiety, and millions and millions of people experiencing that kind of desperation-

KARL: Do you think January 6th was about economic anxiety?

WILLIAMSON: No, I did not say that.

KARL: Well --

WILLIAMSON: But I do think that the election of President Trump the first time in many ways was. Just as I feel that the support of Bernie Sanders, Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump have both said to the American people, “I understand your rage. I understand you're upset with an obviously economically rigged system.” And that is what the Democrats need to offer in 2024, a president who isn't just saying, “oh, it's going well,” to millions of people for whom nothing like that is true, but rather we understand that you are living at the effect of an unjust economic system. And we are going to change that.

KARL: But do you think we may see a violent revolution in this country?

WILLIAMSON: Hear me out. We -- I think people, particularly people living in this town, it's so interesting in this town, I'd always heard it was a bubble. It's actually more like a walled city. Sometimes I don't think people in this town even know what's going on out there. Obviously didn't know what was going on there in 2000s, out there in 2016. I think that people who are at their wit's end are closer to the gates of the Bastille than we have any idea. All kinds of chaos could erupt, all kinds of chaos is already erupting in our society, chaos inside people, their addictions, their suicides, their depression, we must address the suffering that is going on within the hearts of so many millions of people.

KARL: That sounds a little bit like American carnage. I mean, your -- your -- your description.

WILLIAMSON: American Carnage? Yeah, that was -- oh, no, absolutely it is not, because this is what I'm saying. He wanted to exploit that pain for his own. What you're referring to the president, the president exploited that pain for his own political purposes. His own, his own Son in law said that he had said to his father-in-law, there are a lot of angry people out there, we could harness all that and elect you president. I'm saying there's a lot of dignity, decency, intelligence and love out there. And we can harness that for political purposes, we but we must make that U turn. We are supposedly a country based on liberty and justice. We do not have economic justice, or environmental justice, or criminal justice or racial justice in this country. And candidates who pretend otherwise, are not going to be able to reach into the hearts of the American people in lit and win in 2024. And even more importantly, will not be able to repair the incredible damage that has been done to this country over the last 50 years.

KARL: All right. Well, thank you for taking the time to talk with us and we'll be following your campaign.

WILLIAMSON: Thank you very, very much.

玛丽安·威廉姆森捍卫领导地位，反驳“无法控制的愤怒”的说法

Marianne Williamson defends leadership, pushes back on claim of 'uncontrollable rage'

作者：弗里茨·法罗 2023 年 6 月 29 日

“我认为这场竞选是对一个体系的挑战”：玛丽安·威廉姆森

“我认为这场竞选是对一个体系的挑战”：玛丽安·威廉姆森

美国广播公司新闻的乔恩·卡尔在“本周”节目中采访了玛丽安·威廉姆森。
民主党总统候选人、受欢迎的演说家和畅销自助书籍作者玛丽安·威廉姆森 (Marianne Williamson) 在初选中向总统乔·拜登发起黑马挑战，在英国逗留一个月后，她正认真地重返竞选活动。 孙子。

“现在我回来了，我将立即开始行动，”威廉姆森告诉美国广播公司新闻。

这是一条明显不同的竞选路线。 在那段时间，威廉姆森失去了第二位竞选经理，前总统唐纳德·特朗普因他否认的联邦指控而被起诉，总统的儿子亨特与检察官达成认罪协议，六名主要候选人进入共和党初选。

随着威廉姆森重新出现在新罕布什尔州、密歇根州、马萨诸塞州和伊利诺伊州，她在接受美国广播公司新闻采访时谈到了其中一些话题。

本月，在代理竞选经理彼得·达乌 (Peter Daou) 离开几周后，罗扎·卡尔德龙 (Roza Calderón) 也以竞选经理的身份离开了威廉姆森的团队。 据 Politico 报道，威廉姆森 2020 年竞选活动的一些工作人员详细介绍了他们与一名候选人合作的经历，据称这名候选人表现出“无法控制的愤怒”，导致工作人员哭泣，这是一次人事变动。

更多信息：玛丽安·威廉姆森谈总统竞选、新的民主党全国委员会初选日程：“本周”独家
“有人不喜欢我直率的性格、我的直接，那么我很抱歉。那么，显然，这对他们来说不是合适的竞选活动，”威廉姆森在回应这些员工的说法时说道。 “有很多为我工作过的人都说了很多好话，而且我和他们相处得很好。”

威廉姆森的竞选团队辩称，她所面临的批评通常只会困扰其他女性。 当美国广播公司新闻问威廉姆森对她最公正的批评是什么时，她似乎接受了自己的直率。

“也许我可以很强硬，但不像他们说的那样强硬，”她说，并补充道，“毕竟我正在竞选总统。我认为你需要一个强硬的人。”

照片：2019 年 7 月 30 日在密歇根州底特律福克斯剧院举行的民主党总统辩论期间，民主党总统候选人玛丽安·威廉姆森 (Marianne Williamson) 发言，众议员蒂姆·瑞安 (D-OH) 聆听。

2019 年 7 月 30 日，密歇根州底特律福克斯剧院举行的民主党总统辩论期间，民主党总统候选人玛丽安·威廉姆森 (Marianne Williamson) 发表讲话，众议员蒂姆·瑞安 (Tim Ryan) 聆听。
贾斯汀沙利文/盖蒂图片社
然而，这位精神顾问表示，据报道，前工作人员对她的评论，以及困扰她竞选活动的高层更替，并不能反映她的领导能力。

“我们有一支优秀的团队，”她坚持道。 “实现这一切需要时间。亚伯拉罕·林肯经历了 12 位将军才到达尤利西斯·S·格兰特，我认为没有人会说他不是一位优秀的经理。”

威廉姆森面临着与拜登的一场艰苦战斗，拜登对她进行初选辩论的呼吁不予理睬，自 75 年前现代辩论巡回赛开始以来，现任总统还没有参加过初选辩论。

据 FiveThirtyEight 报道，拜登在民意调查中继续以大幅领先优势领先于她； 本月，他举办了八场大型筹款活动，周四还计划在纽约举行另外两场筹款活动，预计他也会在金钱竞赛中轻松超越她。 值得注意的是，正如美国广播公司附属机构 WMUR 当时报道的那样，威廉姆森在 2020 年的竞选活动中遇到了资金短缺的问题，迫使她在第一次初选之前解雇了全部员工。

但她仍抱有希望。

“美国政治非常非常难以预测，”她说。

威廉姆森表示，她不会把比赛变成个人的事情。 对她来说，这包括不将亨特·拜登与检察官达成的协议武器化——仍在等待法官的批准——在该协议中，他将承认两项轻罪税务指控，并进入审前分流计划，以避免因枪支重罪指控而被起诉 。

更多：玛丽安·威廉姆森“很伤心地看到”卡琳·让-皮埃尔开玩笑说她的候选资格渺茫
威廉姆森说：“我认为我们需要记住的是，亨特·拜登没有竞选总统。” “亨特·拜登不是他的父亲，所以亨特·拜登的法律问题不关我的事，也不应该关你的事。”

她后来补充说，“这确实与这场比赛无关。”

2019 年 7 月 30 日，密歇根州底特律福克斯剧院举行的民主党总统辩论期间，民主党总统候选人玛丽安·威廉姆森 (Marianne Williamson) 发表讲话，众议员蒂姆·瑞安 (Tim Ryan) 聆听。
然而，这位精神顾问表示，据报道，前工作人员对她的评论，以及困扰她竞选活动的高层更替，并不能反映她的领导能力。

“我们有一支优秀的团队，”她坚持道。 “实现这一切需要时间。亚伯拉罕·林肯经历了 12 位将军才到达尤利西斯·S·格兰特，我认为没有人会说他不是一位优秀的经理。”

威廉姆森面临着与拜登的一场艰苦战斗，拜登对她进行初选辩论的呼吁不予理睬，自 75 年前现代辩论巡回赛开始以来，现任总统还没有参加过初选辩论。

据 FiveThirtyEight 报道，拜登在民意调查中继续以大幅领先优势领先于她； 本月，他举办了八场大型筹款活动，周四还计划在纽约举行另外两场筹款活动，预计他也会在金钱竞赛中轻松超越她。 值得注意的是，正如美国广播公司附属机构 WMUR 当时报道的那样，威廉姆森在 2020 年的竞选活动中遇到了资金短缺的问题，迫使她在第一次初选之前解雇了全部员工。

但她仍抱有希望。

“美国政治非常非常难以预测，”她说。

威廉姆森表示，她不会把比赛变成个人的事情。 对她来说，这包括不将亨特·拜登与检察官达成的协议武器化——仍在等待法官的批准——在该协议中，他将承认两项轻罪税务指控，并进入审前分流计划，以避免因枪支重罪指控而被起诉 。

更多：玛丽安·威廉姆森“很伤心地看到”卡琳·让-皮埃尔开玩笑说她的候选资格渺茫
威廉姆森说：“我认为我们需要记住的是，亨特·拜登没有竞选总统。” “亨特·拜登不是他的父亲，所以亨特·拜登的法律问题不关我的事，也不应该关你的事。”

她后来补充说，“这确实与这场比赛无关。”

相反，威廉姆森表示，她将重点关注乔·拜登作为总统的工作，以及她所批评的他的政府在解决美国人面临的问题上的“渐进方法”，并表示拜登竞选团队吹捧的立法——包括《通货膨胀削减法案》——并没有起到作用。 走得足够远。

威廉姆森的政纲包括倡导“根本性经济改革”、全民医疗保健、免学费大学和免费儿童保育。

拜登的连任竞选得到了威廉姆森本人的盟友政客的支持，其中包括佛蒙特州参议员伯尼·桑德斯。 她的 2024 年竞选网站称，桑德斯是 2016 年唯一一位承认存在“被操纵”系统并“想要对此采取行动”的候选人。

威廉姆森告诉美国广播公司新闻：“如果桑德斯参议员认为以这种渐进的方式实现这一目标就足够了，我尊重他的观点。” “但这不是我的。”

照片：2023 年 3 月 11 日，玛丽安·威廉姆森在新罕布什尔州曼彻斯特的 Bookery Manchester 与公众讨论她的竞选纲领。

2023 年 3 月 11 日，玛丽安·威廉姆森在新罕布什尔州曼彻斯特的 Bookery Manchester 与公众讨论她的竞选纲领。
威廉姆森对拜登 2020 年竞选的主题以及他在连任竞选中再次部署的主题进行了猛烈抨击，他说：“在我们帮助人们修复他们的生活之前，我们不会修复美国，而为了做到这一点，你可以” 不仅仅是说我们要治愈美国的灵魂。”

她不会给拜登的表现打分，不过她表示，在 2020 年大选中击败唐纳德·特朗普后，她会给他打“A”。

根据美国广播公司新闻和其他媒体获得的录音，特朗普连任总统的前景“真的很可怕”，因为他在卸任后发表的言论似乎承认并炫耀了一份敏感的军事文件。

她表示，她对特朗普的言论“并不感到震惊”，特朗普否认自己在录音中的互动中拥有机密材料。

威廉姆森说：“我认为，最令人震惊的是他在如此重要的事情上缺乏理智上的清醒。” “这些文件涉及非常非常严重的军事问题。这个人甚至没有认真对待民主本身、总统传统，或者显然是总统的责任。”

威廉姆森还表示，她觉得自己应该受到更认真的对待。 她说，她对那些人给她的竞选贴上“希望渺茫”的标签感到不满，试图使她的候选资格失去合法性。 她说她认为对她最大的误解是她是一个“疯狂的、水晶般的泼妇”。

从未担任过民选公职的威廉姆森认为，缺乏政治经验不是障碍，而是一种优势。

“问题不在于我们华盛顿没有优秀的政治汽车修理工，”她引用了她向选民宣传的部分内容。 “问题是我们走错了路。这就是我所知道的。”

但当被问及她是否会选择一名民选官员作为她的副总统竞选搭档时，威廉姆森说：“当然。”

“我认为这是个好主意，是的”她说。 “因为我们确实需要房间里有一个了解这些政治机制的人。”

Marianne Williamson defends leadership, pushes back on claim of ‘uncontrollable rage’

KARL: Thank you. Excellent.