2022 (857)
2023 (2384)
Why was China, the oldest existing civilization, never wiped out like all the other ancient civilizations?
China, as one of the oldest civilizations in the world, has managed to survive and thrive for thousands of years due to a number of factors. One of the main reasons is its geographical location. China's vast territory and diverse geography provided natural barriers that protected it from invaders. Additionally, the Yellow and Yangtze Rivers, which run through the heart of China, provided fertile land for agriculture, which allowed the civilization to sustain a large population.Another important factor is the development of a centralized government system early on in China's history. This allowed for the efficient administration and management of resources, which helped to maintain stability and continuity in the civilization.Finally, China's rich cultural heritage and advanced technology also played a role in its survival. For example, the invention of gunpowder and papermaking during China's Han Dynasty allowed for significant advancements in warfare and communication.Overall, the combination of geographical, political, and technological factors helped China to survive and thrive as one of the oldest civilizations in the world.
I have seen many people mistakenly focus on who is the earliest civilization.
But I want the questioner's meaning is why China can survive in the oldest batch of civilizations?
This view comes from Arnold J. Toynbee.
In fact, this is caused by inconsistent standards.
Chinese people are centered on cultural identity, as long as they identify with Chinese culture, then they are Chinese.
After the establishment of Chinese civilization, it has only undergone dynasty changes, and language, culture, and major ethnic groups have always been in the same line.
And ancient Egypt was completely annihilated by Arabia.
Sumer was killed by Akkad very early.
Ancient Indian(Harappan Civilization) civilization was destroyed by Aryan.
The main languages, cultures, and races are very different in this land.
We know that there is no evolutionary relationship between ancient Indian writing and modern Indian writing.
The Chinese civilization is like a melting pot. The Huns, Di, Jie, Qiang, Xianbei, Khitan, Mongolia, and Jurchen have entered China one after another, but most of their culture has disappeared, and many ethnic groups do not exist.
Every dynasty in China has written records, and there is no chronology. Four regions, including ancient Egypt, ancient Greece, ancient Turkey, and ancient Persia, did not have any written records after the invasion.
In some four to five hundred years, people gradually lost their knowledge and understanding of their own writing. Writing ability.
Today's Chinese people use scripts that were already used during the Shang Dynasty.
In terms of scripts, they have evolved from oracle bone inscriptions to regular scripts.
We now read Chinese poems three thousand years ago (some early Zhou Dynasty poems in the "Book of Songs"), and we will find that they still rhyme.
The ancient edition of "The Book of Songs" (770 BC-221 BC) of the Spring and Autumn Period and Warring States Period can be converted into modern Chinese characters verbatim, and we can still understand part of the content without transforming into modern Chinese characters.
PS:I don't want to say which civilization is better, but just provide a point of view.
Because there are different conclusions under different standards.