生物精英们的悲哀
[版面:生物学][首篇作者:USMedEdu] , 2011年01月25日20:48:56
发信人: USMedEdu (US_CMGs), 信区: Biology
标 题: 生物精英们的悲哀
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jan 25 20:48:56 2011, 美东)
生物精英们的悲哀:
【 在 albertsmwk (.)(.) 的大作中提到: 】
: 在这里兴奋剂是害人害己。。。把别人搞成千老,害人;把别人搞成发考题,害己。
照这位的说法,医版也好,俺的俱乐部也好,大家分享考经,面经,如何住院SURVIVE,
都是干着让别人学会师傅招数饿死师傅自己的蠢事了?!
嗯,看着聪明的说法,也难怪鬼子们都说:中国人个个看着是条龙,闹到一起是堆虫。
呵呵,生物精英在国内那么牛B,这会儿都是瘪孙子样了!?国内牛B的勇气和神气
哪去了?让鬼子撒了气门芯还是自宫了?
我是个老CMG,一点不牛不说,按这版和医版的不少国人的标准看,还很露色--一大
把年龄才混出住院当上医生,而且才3年多就又换了工作。但俺有一点比你们牛:俺
不信这个邪,俺自己做起,自吹自擂,替别人做嫁妆,同时也鼓动大家一起自吹自
擂,大家一起分享经验。医版, 我的俱乐部,美国医学教育博客--买卖题第一热门博
客--一个以考版为目标没有任何抓眼球生活八卦的专业博客--能有现在这种大家分
享的火热,就是我所希望看到的和这4年努力换来的。也说明
虽在
国内没你们这些生物人牛B的CMG能认识到自己的价值,有勇气和努力去改变自
身的地位,而且更重要的是知道相互帮助提携,最后大家包括自己,整个CMG
医生群体一道收益。
努力但失败了并不是露色儿,只会哭天喊地,不做任何努力又自己看不起自己的目
前职业,又没勇气去TRY和改变,这才是真正的露色儿。
在怎么说,你们也要比下面这个老墨非法移民当初地位和条件好多了吧?
你们有本事板砖和口水俺老刀没半点球用,我还是我,你还是你。看看这个老墨还
有从你们这个生物版闯出去的,被美国医学院录取的DOJO是如何自我改变身份和境
地的。他俩比俺牛多了,板砖他俩似乎更解你们的气。呵呵。
Posted on Friday, December 28, 2007 - 02:52 pm:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
坚实的大地──从非法农场劳工移民到神经外科医生的旅程
“Terra Firma ─ A Journey from Migrant Farm Labor to Neurosurgery”
AlfredoQuiones- Hinojosa,M.D./力刀 编译
(注:Dr. Quiones- Hinojosa现为霍普金斯大学医学院神经外科
和肿瘤科助理教授、脑肿瘤干细胞实验室主任)
“你将在田野里干活来度过你的余生了”!这是我侄子在我八十年代中到达美国时
对我说的话。当时情景几乎确实将是我的命运了:一个不懂英语、没有任何生存支
持和依靠的十九岁青年人还能有什么出路呢?
我出生并长大在一个墨西哥小农场。五岁起就在父亲的加油站干活了。家境贫穷,
困苦疾病缠绕:我才三岁时,还是婴儿的妹妹因痢疾而死就是我最初的记忆。父母
终日工作 尚能挣得足够的钱养活我们,而直到七十年代经济危机袭击我的国家,一
切都变了。他们再也不能养活我们全家人了。那时我已受训成为教师,但我的所得
也无法提供足够食物来养家。为生计谋,我打了铺盖卷,兜里揣着六十五美元,非
法穿越国境进入美国。但第一次越境到加州却被逮着遣返了回来。不甘心,我再次
冒险却成功了。
什么法律的,我就是有个只想过上好的生活的梦,能摆脱贫穷,有朝一日耀祖光宗
荣归故里。。
然而,现实和梦想是如此巨大反差。我终日在田里摘水果和蔬菜,睡在漏雨的棚子
里,逮着什么吃什么,整日双手磨损得血乎流啦的。但就是这农场生活教会了我大
量有关经济、法律、政治和社会的知识,我懂得了在一个陌生国度里非法和贫穷的
身份比我以往经历的贫穷更为痛苦。社会上人们将因我所受的教育而以不同方式对
待我。所以,当我叔叔对我说上述那番话时,我就已铁了心要证明他说错了。于是,
我夜里做清洁工,接着去干电焊工以便能进一个社区大学学习英语。
一九八九年,我有过一场意外其导致我从新估价我的生活:我在工作时失足跌落一
个曾用来盛燃油的大灌车。我的姐夫,Ramon,把我救了上来,我俩都差点儿丧命。
当我被救醒时,看到一个白衣大褂的医生在床前。那一瞬间,我感到我有了救护人,
我站在坚实的大地上──“TERRA FIRMA”!
社区大学毕业,我被加州大学伯克利录取,由于坚实的数学和科学基础、强烈的欲
望、良好的教育指导,使我进入了神经科学研究。我的一个导师让我坚信我能去任
何我想去的医学院。多谢他那支持和鼓励,我最终进入了哈佛大学医学院!
1994年,当我开始医学院生涯时,少数民族成员仅占全美人口的18%,而医
学院里Faculty仅占3.7%。虽然他们的数量少,但却很优秀。我有幸遇
到少数民族裔教师榜样。而由于我的学习背景,当我成为医学生时,我就瞄上了神
经外科这一专业。
我还清楚地记得当我在大三时第一次激动地看到神经外科医生打开病患的颅骨,和
硬脑膜,暴露出那真正新鲜的大脑的场景。而那年,一位教授强烈建议我去做家庭
医生并强调我为我的西班牙裔社区移民民众服务这是最好的出路。尽管我起初曾想
过回墨西哥的荣耀,但我已深爱美利坚这对我已不可分离的土地和社会。我看到并
坚信成为一个学者型的医生不仅将促进和提高我们理解和治疗人类疾病的能力和技
艺,而且将会提供医学领域的领导和支持未来的主流社会和少数民族族裔科学家、
医学生和科学医务工作者。
我的祖母在家乡小镇上是个乡村女医生。当我步入知天命之年,我才更深刻地认识
到她老人家对于我起了多么重要的榜样和指导作用。她不仅让我知道治愈病患的价
值,而且决定他人命运和未来是更为重要。她是我人生经历的第一个楷模,而且,
在握整个人生中,我众多的导师们都给予我帮助去寻得和实现我的梦想。从加州的
田野谷地到的领域,这是多么漫长艰辛的一段旅程啊。
而今,我作为一个神经外科医生,参与着大量的临床、科研和教学工作,进行着脑
肿瘤的临床和基础科研以期能发现战胜这类疾病的途径。作为一个美国公民,我也
同时参与和行进在这个国家和社会的伟大历史旅程中。,如同我这样一个曾是非法
移民的人一样,这个旅程依然意味真引导我们追求更好的生活,不仅我们本身的,
而且回馈给予这个社会。
登载于 新英格兰医学杂志 NEJM 2005, 357:6; 2007 麻省医学协会杂志:
“Terra Firma ─ A Journey from Migrant Farm Labor to Neurosurgery”
寄自 美国 刀客论坛 www.dok-forum.net/
美国医学教育博客:http://www.mitbbs.com/pc/index.php?id=USMedEdu
译后记:
非常吃惊和遗憾看到在mitbbs.com医学职业这样专业论坛上竟然不断有来自大陆的
医(学)生连最起码不说职业道德,做人准则都不具备,以他人年龄、不同专业和职
业为嘲笑和蔑视目标的。这样的人不说该立即被删除其混蛋帖子、踢出论坛、在职
业场合和单位,将收到严惩甚至开除的!
1997年,当我第一次走进USMLE考场,看到那些来自东欧、前苏联、印度及各国的白
发苍苍老医生们在应考时,我当即血涌上头,立志不考过不过了60岁,我绝不罢休!
当我近天命之年,完成我的住院医生和FELLOWSHIPS培训,进入大学成为病理医生和
助教,我依旧感到我心理年龄与正读的住院们一样,我心依旧。虽然我没能实现我
当初的目标--成为器官移植外科医生,但我仍为自己能走完病理培训成为ACADEMIC病
理医生和教师而自豪。我不能象DR。Quiones- Hinojosa那样成功
和辉煌,但我仍能用我的所学和经验教训来帮助和鼓舞支持后来的人们,我愿并正
从事着他所做的:为了我们少数民族医生们的地位和权益而努力争斗!
我利用节日前稍空闲的时间,花了两个小时编译了这篇动人的文章,希望给那些犹
豫傍徨的人们一些精神力量,也希望那些说过极端不PRO话语的人,能认识到自己所
言的荒唐和对他人和自己的人格的践踏!
请各位读读这篇译文:
坚实的大地--从非法农场劳工移民到神经外科医生的旅程
http://www.mitbbs.com/pc/pccon.php?id=2289&nid=29363
寄自美国 刊登在 2008 华夏快递 kd081218.
http://archives.cnd.org/HXWK/author/LI-Dao/kd081218-4.gb.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
温柔一刀
Gang He
版主
登录账号: dok_knife
上帖数量: 5358
注册日期: 05-2004
Posted on Wednesday, January 02, 2008 - 02:12 pm:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Terra Firma — A Journey from Migrant Farm Labor
to Neurosurgery
Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa, M.D.
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/reprint/357/6/529.pdf
“You will spend the rest of
your life working in the
fields,” my cousin told me when
I arrived in the United States in
the mid-1980s. This fate indeed
appeared likely: a 19-
year-old illegal migrant
farm worker, I
had no English language
skills and no
dependable means of
support. I had grown
up in a small Mexican
farming community,
where I began
working at my father’s
gas station at
the age of 5. Our
family was poor, and
we were subject to the diseases
of poverty: my earliest memory
is of my infant sister’s death
from diarrhea when I was 3 years
old. But my parents worked long
hours and had always made
enough money to feed us, until
an economic crisis hit our country
in the 1970s. Then they could
no longer support the family,
and although I trained to be a
teacher, I could not put enough
food on the table either.
Desperate for a livable income,
I packed my few belongings
and, with $65 in my pocket,
crossed the U.S. border illegally.
The first time I hopped the fence
into California, I was caught
and sent back to Mexico, but I
tried again and succeeded. I am
not condoning illegal immigration;
honestly, at the time, the
law was far from the front of my
mind. I was merely responding
to the dream of a better life, the
hope of escaping poverty so that
one day I could return home triumphant.
Reality, however, posed
a stark contrast to the dream. I
spent long days in the fields picking
fruits and vegetables, sleeping
under leaky camper shells,
eating anything I could get, with
hands bloodied from pulling
weeds — the very same hands
that today perform brain surgery.
My days as a farm worker
taught me a great deal about
economics, politics, and society.
I learned that being illegal and
poor in a foreign country could
be more painful than any poverty
I had previously experienced.
I learned that our society sometimes
treats us differently depending
on the places we have
been and the education we have
obtained. When my cousin told
me I would never escape that life
of poverty, I became determined
to prove him wrong. I took night
Copyright © 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
Downloaded from www.nejm.org at THE OHIO STATE UNIV on August 26, 2007 .
PERSPECTIVE
n engl j med 357;6 www.nejm.org august 9, 200530 7
jobs as a janitor and subsequently
as a welder that allowed me to
attend a community college where
I could learn English.
In 1989, while I was working
for a railroad company as a welder
and high-pressure valve specialist,
I had an accident that
caused me to reevaluate my life
once again. I fell into a tank car
that was used to carry liquefied
petroleum gas. My father was
working at the same company.
Hearing a coworker’s cry for help,
he tried to get into the tank; fortunately,
someone stopped him. It
was my brother-in-law, Ramon,
who climbed in and saved my
life. He was taken out of the
tank unconscious but regained
consciousness quickly. By the time
I was rescued, my heart rate had
slowed almost to zero, but I was
resuscitated in time. When I
awoke, I saw a person dressed all
in white and was flooded with a
sense of security, confidence, and
protection, knowing that a doctor
was taking care of me. Although
it was clear to me that our
poverty and inability to speak English
usually translated into suboptimal
health care for my community,
the moment I saw this
physician at my bedside, I felt I
had reached terra firma, that I had
a guardian.
After community college, I was
accepted at the University of California,
Berkeley, where a combination
of excellent mentorship,
scholarships, and my own passion
for math and science led me to
research in the neurosciences. One
of my mentors there convinced
me, despite my skepticism, that
I could go anywhere I wanted for
medical school. Thanks to such
support and encouragement, I
eventually went to Harvard Medical
School. As I pursued my own
education, I became increasingly
aware of the need and responsibility
we have to educate our country’s
poor.
It is no secret that minority
communities have the highest
dropout rates and the lowest
educational achievement levels
in the country. The pathway to
higher education and professional
training programs is not
“primed” for minority students.
In 1994, when I started medical
school, members of minority
groups made up about 18% of
the U.S. population but accounted
for only 3.7% of the faculty in
U.S. medical schools. I was very
fortunate to find outstanding
minority role models, but though
their quality was high, their numbers
were low.
Given my background, perhaps
it is not surprising that I
did not discover the field of neurosurgery
until I was a medical
student. I vividly remember when,
in my third year of medical
school, I first witnessed neurosurgeons
peeling back the dura
and exposing a real, live, throbbing
human brain. I recall feeling
absolute awe and humility —
and an immediate and deep
recognition of the intimacy between
a patient and a doctor.
That year, one of my professors
strongly encouraged me to
go into primary care, arguing
that it was the best way for me
to serve my Hispanic immigrant
community. Although I had initially
intended to return to Mexico
triumphant, I had since fallen
in love with this country, and
I soon found myself immersed
in and committed to the betterment
of U.S. society. With my
sights set on neurosurgery after
medical school, I followed my
heart and instincts and have tried
to contribute to my community
and the larger society in my own
way. I see a career in academic
medicine as an opportunity not
only to improve our understanding
and treatment of human diseases
but also to provide leadership
within medicine and support
to future scientists, medical students,
and physician scientists
from minority and nonminority
groups alike.
Terra Firma — A Journey from Migrant Farm Labor to Neurosurgery
Copyright © 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
Downloaded from www.nejm.org at THE OHIO STATE UNIV on August 26, 2007 .
n engl j med 357;6 www.nejm.org august 9, 2007
PERSPECTIVE
531
My grandmother was the medicine
woman in the small town in
rural Mexico where I grew up.
As I have gotten older, I have
come to recognize the crucial
role she played not only in instilling
in me the value of healing
but also in determining the
fate and future of others. She was
my first role model, and throughout
my life I have depended on
the help of my mentors in pursuing
my dreams. Like many other
illegal immigrants, I arrived in
the United States able only to
contemplate those dreams — I
was not at that point on solid
ground. From the fields of the
San Joaquin Valley in California
to the field of neurosurgery, it
has been quite a journey. Today,
as a neurosurgeon and researcher,
I am taking part in the larger
journey of medicine, both caring
for patients and conducting
clinical and translational research
on brain cancer that I hope will
lead to innovative ways of fighting
devastating disease. And as
a citizen of the United States, I am
also participating in the great
journey of this country. For immigrants
like me, this voyage still
means the pursuit of a better
life — and the opportunity to
give back to society.
An interview with Dr. Quiñones-Hinojosa
can be heard at www.nejm.org.
Dr. Quiñones-Hinojosa is an assistant professor
of neurosurgery and oncology and
director of the brain-tumor stem-cell laboratory
at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine,
Baltimore, and director of the braintumor
program at the Johns Hopkins
Bayview campus.
Copyright © 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Terra Firma — A Journey from Migrant Farm Labor to Neurosurgery
Pay for Performance, Version 2.0?
Thomas H. Lee, M.D.
“Old wine in a new bottle.” “A
financial gamble.” “An early
glimpse of the next generation of
pay for performance.” All these
appraisals have been applied to
Geisinger Health System’s new approach
to elective coronary-artery
bypass grafting (CABG), which
has been described with words
rarely invoked in health care, such
as “promise” and “guarantee.”
Geisinger, an integrated health
care delivery system in northeastern
Pennsylvania, promises
that 40 key processes will be
completed for every patient who
undergoes elective CABG — even
though several of the “benchmarks”
are to be reached before
or after hospitalization. And although
Geisinger cannot guarantee
good clinical outcomes, it
charges a standard flat rate that
covers care for related complications
during the 90 days after
surgery.
As a member of Geisinger’s
board of directors, I have watched
this program evolve over the past
year, and I see truth in all three
of the above assessments. Many
of the core components of the
program are familiar, but this
sort of application of those components
represents a foray into
the unknown. Since a front-page
article in the New York Times on
May 17, 2007, drew national attention
to the Geisinger program,
other hospitals have been
watching closely and wondering
whether they, too, should go
down this road. Those who examine
it closely will quickly discover
that the program is less
about cardiac surgery than about
the search for an alternative to
traditional fee-for-service care.
The basic concept is far from
radical. The seven cardiac surgeons
in the Geisinger delivery
system agreed on 40 processes
that should be completed during
the care of every patient undergoing
elective CABG. Most of
the “Proven Care Benchmarks”
come directly from guidelines
established by the American College
of Cardiology and the American
Heart Association (ACC–AHA)
(see box). These steps (such as
the administration of preoperative
antibiotics at a specified time)
are prominent in the critical pathways
in use for cardiac surgery
at many other hospitals.
The list does not force the surgeons
to practice “cookbook medicine.”
For example, they do not
necessarily have to use epiaortic
echocardiography to screen for
atheromata before manipulating
the aorta. But the protocol requires
that they consider this test
and document the reason if they
decide not to use it.
Closer inspection reveals some
other items on the list that would
be new to most critical pathways
for CABG. The first benchmark
that must be documented is a
statement of the indication for
CABG according to the ACC–AHA
guidelines.1 These guidelines de-
Copyright © 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
Downloaded from www.nejm.org at THE OHIO STATE UNIV on August 26, 2007 .
发信人: USMedEdu (US_CMGs), 信区: Biology
标 题: Re: 生物精英们的悲哀
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jan 25 20:56:59 2011, 美东)
给搞生物不爽抱怨不休的扔个板砖吧:改变自己的命运还是靠自己!
http://www.mitbbs.com/pc/pccon.php?id=2289&nid=86053
作者:USMedEdu
发表时间:2009-05-11
更新时间:2009-05-13
浏览:609次
给搞生物不爽抱怨不休的扔个板砖吧:改变自己的命运还是靠自己!
发信人: USMedEdu (US_CMGs), 信区: Biology
标 题: 来扔个燃烧瓶或板砖吧:改变自己的命运还是靠自己!
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon May 11 15:28:09 2009)
俺以前从不来这里,今天就也来扔个燃烧瓶或板砖吧:
cited:
"发信人: Oncogene (基因头), 信区: Biology
标 题: 善意提示
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jan 12 10:33:53 2009)
Oncogene善意提示:
1. 无论POSTDOC还是学生, 选择老板时, 其人品, FUNDING, 科研水平要综合考虑. 如
果其中任何一个因素有严重缺陷, 请做好炼狱的心理准备.
2. 基础生物学研究学术道路基本时间表:PHD STUDY 5年 + POSTDOC 5年 +
Assistant Professor 5年 = Tenured Faculty.(特别声明:一般观点认为,只有10%
甚至更少的生物学PHD学位持有者最终能够成为AP,因此,选择生物学作为你的终身职
业前请务必三思)
3.If you are a postdoc in US, please join the NPA-National Postdoctoral
Association : An investment in your future! (http://www.nationalpostdoc.org)
......"
其实,我觉得你们搞生物的牛X们最好的出路除了撞着大运找到发考题位置,和生物
公司高薪位置,要是能自我从新设计开辟新路的话,考MCAT上医学院走行医之路是
最好的--当然,你会说,丫的谁不知道医生挣得多,地位高,可难啊。
俺要说:费话,谁都知道这极不容易,连老美高才生们为进医学院都打得你死我活
的。就是我们从大陆来的有MD资格直接考版申住院的也难得很,绝大多数是在LAB干
了8-10年以上的,才走到今天。这世上容易挣钱和地位高的好事能轻易落到你我第
一代移民头上?
想改变自己的命运,最后主要还是靠自己!
我41岁在北美LAB科研10年,那到GC前才开始考,第一次进考场,我就王八吃秤砣--铁
了心要走下去,不到达考过当医生目标绝不罢手--为何?看到东欧来的那些老毛子
医生,男男女女头发花白了还在考,操,我40岁个爷们不干那可真是没骨气。我也想
好了,就是我50岁才开始当医生,我干到70、75甚至80还有多少年好日子!?总比在
LAB宰耗子RUN PCR、养细胞、为GRANT整日挠秃脑门幸福啊。
所以,我劝各位:去考MCAT,注意和MD老板靠挂当博后为以后进医学院攒资本,如
果能从医学院出来,那你们是AMG,找住院医生就比我们大陆来的考版申住院的要容
易到不菲吹灰之力手到擒来的天经地义之事。
别跟俺说什么,都30多了。我带过的美国学生甚至是学英国文学的、法语的、俩宝
妈的,最后成了医学生,成了住院医生总住院!而你们应该是最接近医学职业的专业了!
而且,具体地说,你们跟我搞的临床病理专业是最接近的学科!
关键是看你自己要什么,有没有guts为之努力!
我在MED职业版为CMG们能进住院忙和乐两年多,我带了6个见习生,近年3个已经提
前录取,其中一个被JHH和UC争着要(当然最后去了JHH)。
我这是第一次也是唯一一次来这里说几句给你们搞BIO的心里话,也算给你们指个
“钱”途吧。爱听不听是你们自己的事,不服的想版砖俺,也没用。
其实,我很敬佩那些有志为科学献身,不在乎清贫的生物和医学科研人士。我自己都
在北美做了10年科研,考科研经历,不用律师,自己用8百刀办成EB1a。
愿意搞科研的我绝对敬重不会对其说什么“去考医生”吧的废话。
只是希望觉得自己在生物看不到出路的夥计们别泄气,在美国这自由地面上,你可
以有其他更好选择。你们比其他任何专业都接近医学,读医学院是很难和很苦的道
路,但毕竟是一条光明“钱途”。我说了举了例子,我带过得美国医学生和住院医
生,有的是文科毕业的,都俩宝妈了转行学医的。
你要没兴趣更没GUTS,我也不会劝你走这条道。
至于我SHOW OFF与否,那是另一回事。我网上打架SHOW OFF都10多年了。
就这么简单。
5/13/2009 于 美国
美国医学教育博客:
http://www.mitbbs.com/pc/index.php?id=USMedEdu (面对全球网站)
http://www.mitbbs.cn/pc/index.php?id=USMedEdu (大陆镜像网站)
刀客论坛--美国医学教育:
http://www.dok-forum.net/discus/messages/19595/19595.html?12362
温柔一刀_力刀博客:
http://www.mitbbs.com/pc/index.php?id=dokknife (面对全球网站)
http://www.mitbbs.cn/pc/index.php?id=dokknife (大陆镜像网站)
--
※ 修改:·USMedEdu 於 May 13 13:27:13 2009 修改本文·[FROM: 140.254.]
发信人: demoner (回不去的叫故乡), 信区: Biology
标 题: [合集] 这里的人真的是没救了
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed May 13 13:23:15 2009), 站内
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Cajal (H4) 于 (Wed May 13 02:03:57 2009) 提到:
你要是醉心科研,献身科研吧,就别进那些劝退改行的帖子,进了也别着急上火骂人撒
泼,否则除了自虐,我都想不出能有什么别的解释。你要是不满现状吧,就认真考虑一
下别人的建议和经验,别谁都不屌结果自己也没混出个什么名堂来。转统计的来介绍经
验,要么就说人家过时,统计早就不吃香了;要么说人家吹牛,哪有拿这么多工资的;
转计算机的来介绍经验,就说人家吃青春饭,早晚被out source;转护士转赌场工作人
员的介绍经验,就说丢不起那人;医生在美国受尊敬了吧,就骂cmg都是无耻的假md,
搞垮Medicare Medicaid的吸血鬼,这倒也罢了,我还真头一回听说做科研的人嫌医生
赚钱少的。
早年间别的行业的人过来踢场子,说做生物的浪费了这么多经费,生物医学发展还这么
慢,我还骂这帮人无知;想不到同样这批被骂浪费钱的人,不懂得推己及人,现在反过
来去骂大夫浪费钱。大夫再黑心,所有的时间精力至少都投入到病人身上去了吧?你们
间接为生命医学作贡献的人居然可以骂直接作贡献的人而不脸红。况且美国搞什么行业
不狠命砸钱了?难道中国大夫不考,美国大夫就不吸血了?有钱赚为什么不能让中国
人赚?不要告诉我你看不得别的中国人混得好。什么?你是看不惯人家到你们场子来显
摆?你tm有受迫害妄想狂啊?人家怎么不去化学版,矿工版,金融版显摆?当前形势之
下,这些行业哪个不鬼哭狼嚎?或者更直接点,人家怎么不去jobhunting版和working
版显摆?那边不老在说被雷么?人家无非看到生物这行和医学最接近,告诉你要是对自
己现状不满意,可以好好考虑一下学医。可有些人就跟阿Q听见别人说“亮”字一样跳
脚。
老引用“医之好治不病以为功”的两位更幽默,要是医生也是骗人的,你们自己的老板
申请经费的时候,有种就别上杆子老把自己的领域往医学,生理和病源学方面扯。
哦,你是看不惯别人在这个纯洁的学术圣地劝退,烦别人来踢场子。一,我又奇怪了,
早几个月有人看不惯版主放任劝退贴,要求改选版主,诸位又跑哪去了?主张保留劝退
贴的版主以优势票连任,难道不是各位自己的意思?
我很早以前就注意到几个id,就是平时牢骚满腹,等别人来介绍改行经验就又是打假又
是奚落--别误会,我不是对这类人有意见,相反,我很爱看这些人的贴子,因为看他们
的帖子,我会明白我两年前决心离开这行的举动是多么明智。假如我继续在这行待着,
以后也就会跟他们一样。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wsbioguy (postdog) 于 (Wed May 13 02:16:56 2009) 提到:
这个鄙视医生挣钱少的几个的确很牛啊, 算开眼了
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
KeeVan (Kevin) 于 (Wed May 13 02:20:56 2009) 提到:
不包括我不吧,我是无知少年,我以为真的十三万呢
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wsbioguy (postdog) 于 (Wed May 13 02:22:15 2009) 提到:
即使就13万, 虽然在东西岸是贫困线以下
在中西部也是小康了吧
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
KeeVan (Kevin) 于 (Wed May 13 02:23:57 2009) 提到:
是。。。听说你们去药厂的也都是十几万,我这么一算,5年学位还有利息呀啥的,不
如去药
厂阿
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wsbioguy (postdog) 于 (Wed May 13 02:29:06 2009) 提到:
医生越老越值钱, 银子越赚越多
公司里越老越不值钱, 50岁往往会集体下岗(混到管理层的牛人除外)
一般loser才去公司混日子,嗯
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
KeeVan (Kevin) 于 (Wed May 13 02:30:45 2009) 提到:
哦,好吧,我以为公司research scientist也是越老越值钱
那看来还是医生牛
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
nolan (若兰) 于 (Wed May 13 02:50:49 2009) 提到:
唉,我的大师兄贝雷之后一直找不到位子,原因是在前一个公司里已经是senior
scientist,别的公司招不起;在家待了一阵子之后,只好自己开公司了
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
nolan (若兰) 于 (Wed May 13 02:55:03 2009) 提到:
公司里RA最牛,雷scientist,也不雷RA
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
peoplem (我爱我家) 于 (Wed May 13 03:34:48 2009) 提到:
没必要这么气急败坏吧 要我说 stay or leave 只要是被积极的动力驱动 不管是热爱
还是为了养活自己 还是为了照顾妻儿 都值得尊重。如果是被消极的力量驱动 比如说是
不敢尝试 缺少勇气 眼高手低 或者反过来是这山望着那山高 盲目从众 盲目仇视自己
的工作 自卑 blabla.. 都值得鄙视 就这么回事 你要是非要抱着学医
就是高就是好就是有前途来面对我们这些还在biology圈子里的人 那我看你还是关了bb
s自己偷着乐就算了 我们还没贱到要唾面自干甚至受宠若惊好不好
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Cajal (H4) 于 (Wed May 13 07:55:43 2009) 提到:
我对那位哥们的帖子理解很简单,就是当大夫是一条可以考虑的出路,而且同样要学医
,生物出身的比别的行业的人优势更多,而且人家话里话外也点明了--他都可以,在座
各位很多也都可以。你自己有你自己的价值观,他觉得高的你不见得非要和他想的一样
。我没有注意到他原文哪里写着:学医就是牛逼,你们这些人都不该干别的,就该学医
。你找给我看看。
倒不知道怎么着就被你们给理解成对你们显摆了,真除了被迫害妄想我都想不出别的解
释,还唾面自干呢,自己不自信才老觉得自己被人唾吧?受宠若惊就更莫名其妙了,你
是不是觉得别人来帮忙的都是有不可告人的目的,至少是巴望你来感激?
顺便说一声,医生和护士是少数两个给我再多钱我也不愿意做的行业,但这不妨碍我敬
重有毅力考过三步及其耗费体力脑力的资格考试的cmg们,更何况4年住院医甚至正式入
行后的工作强度,比起变态老板手下的phd和postdoc只高不低。我自信没有毅力和兴趣
做这行,但我也不会去酸葡萄鄙视人家冒充md或者赚黑心钱。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Cajal (H4) 于 (Wed May 13 08:05:54 2009) 提到:
鄙视医生钱少的大有人在,的确比医生赚钱多的车载斗量,不过,看是谁在鄙视了。平
均年薪不知道有没有6万(不论毕业年限)的行业去鄙视医生钱少,我很是佩服。还是
那句话,潜心科研的本来就不该去理别的行业赚多少钱,又在乎钱又鄙视人家黑心或者
轻视人家钱少那是很莫名其妙的。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
foxn4 (狐狸和舫) 于 (Wed May 13 08:39:47 2009) 提到:
争个这有啥意思?
医生有医生的好,不然为啥这么多人考,
医生有医生的不好,不然为啥这么多学医的该基础了,
学医的改基础了,然后又改回去,有一部分不是因为喜欢,而是生活所迫。
都是混口饭吃,没什么高低之分得
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
seabluepp (cool air) 于 (Wed May 13 09:49:18 2009) 提到:
LZ说的很好,支持一下!
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
KeeVan (Kevin) 于 (Wed May 13 10:01:41 2009) 提到:
其实卡霍哥有什么路子,不如也给我们介绍一下
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Cajal (H4) 于 (Wed May 13 10:23:50 2009) 提到:
我的目标很低,就是一不用看见博士后老板那张脸,二不用按照北京时间在实验室工作
,三是钱比博士后工资稍多点。所以我的经历不会入这里牛人的法眼。而且符合这些要
求的机会不少。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Cajal (H4) 于 (Wed May 13 10:29:22 2009) 提到:
是没什么好争的,只是有些人,别人好心介绍一下经验,提供一点信息,就跟坏了自家
风水一样痛骂。自卑惯了,就觉得人家说什么都是显摆,再好的口气也是盛气凌人。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
eveliyi (Eve) 于 (Wed May 13 10:35:22 2009) 提到:
我怎么听说某医生起薪19万?中国人。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
USMedEdu (US_CMGs) 于 (Wed May 13 11:41:10 2009) 提到:
这位大弟兄算是进一步说了我来这贴这个让未名老板小钻风高兴坏了的搅和帖子真实意
义。
老刀我在麦地、在任何网坛,从10多年前上网发第一篇文字起,没用过马甲,总是
把自己真身亮出,在哪个大学工作、干什么的、我根本不牛,比我牛的同学、同事
多了,比我当医生的早,挣得是我的5倍的医生都有,我都不保留告诉愿意为考版当
医生的小辈们。这两年里我电话、邮件辅导咨询了1千多人次,亲自带出6个见习生,
今年3个被PRE-MATCH进住院,其中大弟子被JOHNS HOPKIN和芝加哥大学椅子男争着
要。
我还真是吃饱撑了,看到生物的最近行情不好,其实医学科研比你们好不到哪去,
来好心劝说给个鼓励,嘿嘿,跟踩了什么人的尾巴一样,真是看到你们这里几个虏
色儿的德性让人可笑。
再说两个我师兄和师弟的故事吧:他俩分别在我上和下一届,都是在大药物公司干,
已经挣12万以上,但听俺们椅子男有突然DROP的空位内部消息,其中师弟是我当即
打电话告诉他消息一手把他拉进来的,人当即二话不说,卖了大房子和地,来当穷
住院,现在各个都是20多万轻松拿着,而他们的朋友同事被LAY OFF的很多,师弟的
公司干脆就倒闭了。其实,无论在药厂还是花儿街,拿到不低于医生收入的不少,
但一有风吹草动经济危机,首先挨刀的就是这个不上不下的阶层夥计们。
我兄弟都在花儿街干,是我工资一倍,但都希望儿子走医生这路。
没看不起生物和科研的意思,我自己科研了10年才回临床的。我不觉得40-50才进住院
丢人。至少,我现在在OSU病理当专科代理主任,领导了3个年资比我早20多年的白人,
他们对我恭恭敬敬,干得太不像样,俺训他跟训住院一样,他们没有二话说。在医学行
业,没有说的,行不行,不看皮肤颜色、年资,而是看你能不能干下来!
反正,俺工资够花、工作对俺轻松舒服、有时间(甚至上班时间)上网码字儿辅导CMG考
版,平时打球打猎玩枪种花种地当农民。我的同行哥们老中比我挣多5倍,买个山头,
豪宅大得每个房间得安扩音器,吃饭时一吆喝,儿女们小不点骑小车窜出来。每年
去各地客入赐游玩。俺一点不嫉妒也不眼红,更不会骂人家牛B。我自己过得高兴,,
在大学当个一般助理教授,慢慢爬副教到正教,可以干到70-80,我自己想退休为止。
不知你们几个抱怨不休得蒙脸虏色儿有何本事牛X,既然有,何必抱怨不休,跟老是
碰不着伯乐似的獗蹄子?
dok
5/13/2009
美国医学教育博客:
http://www.mitbbs.com/pc/index.php?id=USMedEdu (面对全球网站)
http://www.mitbbs.cn/pc/index.php?id=USMedEdu (大陆镜像网站)
刀客论坛--美国医学教育:
http://www.dok-forum.net/discus/messages/19595/19595.html?12362
温柔一刀_力刀博客:
http://www.mitbbs.com/pc/index.php?id=dokknife (面对全球网站)
http://www.mitbbs.cn/pc/index.php?id=dokknife (大陆镜像网站)
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
NoDreamer (锦衣刀客) 于 (Wed May 13 12:42:03 2009) 提到:
美国医生收入差别很大,要看专业/地区/private vs academic/Full time vs part
time....。
我们(private group)刚签了一个马上毕业的专科医生,起薪$25万/年。对一个具体的
工作职位来讲,中国人和美国人起薪上没区别。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
IVYtony (村委书记) 于 (Wed May 13 13:18:30 2009) 提到:
这位Dr 说话不要这么没水平嘛
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
USMedEdu (US_CMGs) 于 (Wed May 13 13:22:36 2009) 提到:
cited:
发信人: Oncogene (基因头), 信区: Biology
标 题: 善意提示
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jan 12 10:33:53 2009)
Oncogene善意提示:
1. 无论POSTDOC还是学生, 选择老板时, 其人品, FUNDING, 科研水平要综合考虑. 如
果其中任何一个因素有严重缺陷, 请做好炼狱的心理准备.
2. 基础生物学研究学术道路基本时间表:PHD STUDY 5年 + POSTDOC 5年 +
Assistant Professor 5年 = Tenured Faculty.(特别声明:一般观点认为,只有10%
甚至更少的生物学PHD学位持有者最终能够成为AP,因此,选择生物学作为你的终身职
业前请务必三思)
3.If you are a postdoc in US, please join the NPA-National Postdoctoral
Association : An investment in your future! (http://www.nationalpostdoc.org)
※ 修改:·USMedEdu 於 Jan 25 20:59:32 2011 修改本文·[FROM: 142.233.]