By: Beth Robertie, Esq. 在不久前，移民局USCIS发布了有关在AC-21条例下I-140和I-485的申请指引。其内容是关于Beneficiary如何可将其原已递交的I-140申请转到新雇主。有关条例信息如下： As you all know, USCIS is constantly issuing new guidance on its rules and procedures. Not long ago, USCIS issued a memorandum regarding the processing of I-140 employment-based immigrant petitions and I-485 Applications to Adjust Status under AC-21, the regulation that authorizes the practice of “porting” an I-140 immigrant petition to a new employer once the beneficiary’s I-485 has been pending for more than 180 days, among other things. If you are unfamiliar with AC-21, please see our earlier memorandums on the subject here and here. In the most recent guidance, USCIS made the following points: * If a beneficiary is porting off of a concurrently filed but unapproved I-140 and I-485 that has been pending for 180 days or more, the underlying I-140 petition will be reviewed to determine if the case is approvable or would have been approvable had it been adjudicated within 180 days. If the underlying petition is approvable, the petition will be approved on its merits, then the I-485 will be adjudicated to determine if the new position is the same or similar occupation classification for I-140 portability purposes. * If for some reason the underlying I-140 petition is denied after the beneficiary has ported to a new employer, the I-485 and the portability request will both be denied as there was never an approved (or approvable) petition from which to port. * A difference in wage offered on the approved labor certification, initial I-140 and the new employment cannot be used as a basis of a denial. However, a substantial discrepancy between the previous and new wage may be taken into consideration as a factor in determining if the new employment is “same or similar.” * The fact that the beneficiary left the I-140 petitioner before the I-485 has been pending 180 days will not necessarily render the alien ineligible to port. However, in all cases an offer of employment must have been bona fide. In other words, as of the time the I-140 was filed and at the time of the I-485 filing if the two are not filed concurrently, the I-140 petitioner must have had the intent to employ the beneficiary, and the alien must have intended to take the employment, upon adjustment. Take, for example, the following situation: John, the alien beneficiary, works as an environmental engineer for a mid-size engineering firm, Company A. Company A files a labor certification for John and gets it approved. Company A then concurrently files an I-140 and I-485 for John. Two months later, Company A suddenly goes out of business. Because he had a bona fide offer of employment with Company A and intended to take the employment at the time that the I-140 and I-485 were filed, John is entitled to work in a same or similar occupation with another employer who is willing to sponsor him so long as Company A does not revoke the I-140 before the I-485 has been pending for 180 days. Once his I-485 has been pending for 180 days, John must notify USCIS that he has ported his I-485. * An I-140 is no longer valid for porting purposes when it is withdrawn before the beneficiary’s I-485 has been pending 180 days, or it is denied or revoked at any time except when it is revoked based on a withdrawal that was ted after an I-485 has been pending for 180 days. --------------------------------- 本文由范毅禹律师事务所提供 本律师事务所精办各类劳工应聘及专业移民申请 (包括H-1，L-1，EB-1，EB-2，NIW，劳工卡，绿卡等申请)。所有申请由多位美籍律师及拥有15年经验的范毅禹律师亲自处理，我所并特设中英移民网站。内有最新移民新闻资讯及由律师主持的移民问答集，欢迎读者流览查询。 www.fan-law.com (Chinese) www.fanuslaw.com (English) CALIFORNIA : Fan, Fitzpatrick & Thompson, LLP. 370 E. Glenarm St., Pasadena , CA 91106 Tel: 626-799-3999 Fax: 626-799-9966 MARYLAND : Fan, Fitzpatrick & Thompson, LLP. 230 North Washington Street, Suite 400 , Rockville , MD 20850 Tel: 301-251-2636 Fax: 301-251-0313